Editing files on the memory card itself can occasionally go wrong, and lose images, so if you can download the files to the computer and read them there, you're probably better off anyway. It's not a bad idea to copy all your files to the hard drive first anyway, and then to edit the copies. It's main advantage is that it will open just about any type of wierd file, so I use it when the other programs can't open a file.On my usage scale, it's about 80% Capture NX, 15% PWP4, and 5% Paint Shop Pro 11.If you have an installed version of View NX-2 that works, one other thing you might try is to use the memory card in the computer, if you have a card reader, and see if that can be read. I'm not using any alpha channels.I still have Paint Shop Pro 11, but as it's color management is very rudimentary, and many editing freatures work only by scaling your image back to 8 bits, it's a program that I use very infrequently now. Neither of them have a good explaination of why there is an incompatibility. I've asked Nikon and I've asked Digital Light & Color (the PWP4 folks). Usually, churning the PWP4 TIFF through Noise Ninja will render the TIFFs readable by Capture NX. The main problem is that TIFF files from PWP4 won't open in Capture NX, and neither will some 16 bit grayscale TIFFS. The main advantage of PWP4 is that it can decode the RAW files from my Kodak digital camera. I use Capture NX for just about everything.I do use Picture Windows Pro 4 also, which is a full-featured, color managed, 16 bit image file editor. keep in mind that Photoshop CS2 includes "Camera RAW" which is a photo editor, which is a different tool than the Photoshop program proper. download (normally 30 day) trials for NX (or Lightroom, etc) and Photoshop or Paintshop Pro or GIMP (no trial for this one) and draw your own conclusion. DxO is a tool for repairing image distortion (barrel distortion, vignetting, blur, CA) caused by the camera's lens (there are other tools that do this). for example, Noise Ninja is focused on removing noise and sharpening of an image (there are other tools that do this). There are other tools that can be thrown into the mix. generally, the photographer will spend much more time on an image with a graphics editor. some tools are better than others at this. photo editors allow you to manipulate a group of images very quickly - you can sort, classify, edit, and publish very quickly. the power in this is that you have complete control over the image, globally. Photo editors are most important when manipulating RAW images. the standard digital workflow is: take photo with camera (some post-processing may happen in the camera) download images to computer edit image with photo editor (say, NX or Lightzone) to correct exposure, crop, etc finally, edit the image with a graphics editor to, say, remove unwanted shadows or a tree branch that appears to impale a person's head. With that said, you can't compare the two different types of editors, since photo editors lack the tools graphics editors provide, and vice-versa.Īs a rule, digital photographers use both tools. Graphics (bitmap) editors (Photoshop, GIMP, Paintshop Pro, etc) can also manipulate a photo (image) globally, just as photo editors do however, graphics editors provide the user various tools (pencils, brushes, burn/dodge, etc) to manipulate the individual pixels that make up an image. generally, there are no "hand tools" (pencil, brushes, etc) to manipulate individual pixels. Photo editors process images globally, such as white balance, tint, contrast, saturation, cropping, and so on. Photoshop and the GIMP (Paintshop Pro and others) are graphics editors, whereas NX, Lightroom, Aperture, Lightzone, etc, are photo editors. Various plugins supply it with raw file support, including UFRaw:įirst a bit of clarification. GIMP is a very capable image editor that's well worth exploring, but it still lacks 16-bit editing and colour management. It's pretty common to use a general purpose image editor like Photoshop alongside NX to provide these missing features, and there are cheaper alternatives to CS2 (including Paint Shop Pro, and Adobe's own Photoshop Elements) available. However, the Nikon packages lack some basic features found in heavy duty image editors like Photoshop and GIMP - e.g., I don't think NX has a clone tool for removing dust spots, etc. The control point technology in NX is also very interesting. The biggest strength of Nikon's own software (Capture, Capture NX, Nikon View and Picture Project) is the way it deals with Nikon's raw (NEF) files (Nikon has developed finely tuned device profiles for its various cameras, and in-camera settings are used in NEF processing that are ignored by generic raw converters).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |